FAIndableTM
Measured, not estimated

The state of pharmacy websites

We read and score real business websites the way AI assistants read them. This page covers 3,539 pharmacy sites, re-read on a rolling cycle. Their average score is 56 out of 100. Every figure below is measured, and moves as the measurements do.

What pharmacy websites have, and what they are missing

The share of measured sites with each practice in place. Movement compares the current reading window with the one before it, shown only where both windows hold a real sample.

PracticeSites that have itMoving
HTTPS100%no earlier window yet
Crawlable98%no earlier window yet
AI crawler access97%no earlier window yet
Mobile viewport96%no earlier window yet
Internal links94%no earlier window yet
Language declared94%no earlier window yet
Linked profiles92%no earlier window yet
robots.txt87%no earlier window yet
Page title84%no earlier window yet
Answer-first opening81%no earlier window yet
Sitemap73%no earlier window yet
Content depth72%no earlier window yet
Meta description67%no earlier window yet
Open Graph65%no earlier window yet
Valid structured data59%no earlier window yet
Opening hours51%no earlier window yet
Canonical URL50%no earlier window yet
Where you are49%no earlier window yet
Name, address, phone48%no earlier window yet
Single main heading46%no earlier window yet
Image alt text45%no earlier window yet
Heading order45%no earlier window yet
Business schema28%no earlier window yet
Question headings16%no earlier window yet
Recently updated13%no earlier window yet
llms.txt13%no earlier window yet
FAQ schema1%no earlier window yet

A practice being common among measured sites is a fact about those sites. It is not a promise that adopting it gets a business recommended, and we publish our research on that question separately as it is measured.

Where does your site stand?

The same checks behind these figures run on any site, free, in about a minute.

Check my score