FAIndable
Measured, not estimated

The state of accountant websites

We read and score real business websites the way AI assistants read them. This page covers 761 accountant sites, re-read on a rolling cycle. Their average score is 54 out of 100. Every figure below is measured, and moves as the measurements do.

What accountant websites have, and what they are missing

The share of measured sites with each practice in place. Movement compares the current reading window with the one before it, shown only where both windows hold a real sample.

PracticeSites that have itMoving
HTTPS99%no earlier window yet
robots.txt91%no earlier window yet
AI crawler access90%no earlier window yet
Internal links89%no earlier window yet
Mobile viewport89%no earlier window yet
Crawlable89%no earlier window yet
Answer-first opening84%no earlier window yet
Linked profiles84%no earlier window yet
Language declared83%no earlier window yet
Sitemap81%no earlier window yet
Content depth69%no earlier window yet
Canonical URL67%no earlier window yet
Page title65%no earlier window yet
Meta description61%no earlier window yet
Open Graph59%no earlier window yet
Single main heading54%no earlier window yet
Valid structured data48%no earlier window yet
Image alt text46%no earlier window yet
Opening hours45%no earlier window yet
Heading order39%no earlier window yet
Where you are37%no earlier window yet
Name, address, phone36%no earlier window yet
Business schema32%no earlier window yet
llms.txt27%no earlier window yet
Question headings22%no earlier window yet
Recently updated19%no earlier window yet
FAQ schema2%no earlier window yet

A practice being common among measured sites is a fact about those sites. It is not a promise that adopting it gets a business recommended, and we publish our research on that question separately as it is measured.

Where does your site stand?

The same checks behind these figures run on any site, free, in about a minute.

Check my score