FAIndable
Measured, not estimated

The state of auto repair websites

We read and score real business websites the way AI assistants read them. This page covers 4,720 auto repair sites, re-read on a rolling cycle. Their average score is 60 out of 100. Every figure below is measured, and moves as the measurements do.

What auto repair websites have, and what they are missing

The share of measured sites with each practice in place. Movement compares the current reading window with the one before it, shown only where both windows hold a real sample.

PracticeSites that have itMoving
HTTPS99%no earlier window yet
AI crawler access99%no earlier window yet
Crawlable98%no earlier window yet
robots.txt92%no earlier window yet
Linked profiles90%no earlier window yet
Internal links89%no earlier window yet
Language declared89%no earlier window yet
Mobile viewport87%no earlier window yet
Sitemap83%no earlier window yet
Answer-first opening81%no earlier window yet
Opening hours76%no earlier window yet
Meta description74%no earlier window yet
Open Graph74%no earlier window yet
Content depth73%no earlier window yet
Canonical URL72%no earlier window yet
Page title69%no earlier window yet
Valid structured data67%no earlier window yet
Single main heading56%no earlier window yet
Image alt text55%no earlier window yet
Where you are44%no earlier window yet
Heading order42%no earlier window yet
Name, address, phone42%no earlier window yet
Business schema41%no earlier window yet
llms.txt36%no earlier window yet
Question headings22%no earlier window yet
Recently updated20%no earlier window yet
FAQ schema6%no earlier window yet

A practice being common among measured sites is a fact about those sites. It is not a promise that adopting it gets a business recommended, and we publish our research on that question separately as it is measured.

Where does your site stand?

The same checks behind these figures run on any site, free, in about a minute.

Check my score