FAIndable
Measured, not estimated

The state of beauty websites

We read and score real business websites the way AI assistants read them. This page covers 4,228 beauty sites, re-read on a rolling cycle. Their average score is 55 out of 100. Every figure below is measured, and moves as the measurements do.

What beauty websites have, and what they are missing

The share of measured sites with each practice in place. Movement compares the current reading window with the one before it, shown only where both windows hold a real sample.

PracticeSites that have itMoving
HTTPS100%no earlier window yet
AI crawler access99%no earlier window yet
Crawlable97%no earlier window yet
Mobile viewport94%no earlier window yet
Linked profiles93%no earlier window yet
robots.txt92%no earlier window yet
Language declared91%no earlier window yet
Internal links84%no earlier window yet
Sitemap83%no earlier window yet
Open Graph80%no earlier window yet
Answer-first opening73%no earlier window yet
Page title67%no earlier window yet
Meta description67%no earlier window yet
Opening hours67%no earlier window yet
Canonical URL66%no earlier window yet
Valid structured data57%no earlier window yet
Content depth57%no earlier window yet
Image alt text51%no earlier window yet
Heading order42%no earlier window yet
Single main heading41%no earlier window yet
Business schema41%no earlier window yet
Where you are35%no earlier window yet
llms.txt34%no earlier window yet
Name, address, phone31%no earlier window yet
Recently updated26%no earlier window yet
Question headings13%no earlier window yet
FAQ schema4%no earlier window yet

A practice being common among measured sites is a fact about those sites. It is not a promise that adopting it gets a business recommended, and we publish our research on that question separately as it is measured.

Where does your site stand?

The same checks behind these figures run on any site, free, in about a minute.

Check my score