FAIndable
Measured, not estimated

The state of builder websites

We read and score real business websites the way AI assistants read them. This page covers 651 builder sites, re-read on a rolling cycle. Their average score is 60 out of 100. Every figure below is measured, and moves as the measurements do.

What builder websites have, and what they are missing

The share of measured sites with each practice in place. Movement compares the current reading window with the one before it, shown only where both windows hold a real sample.

PracticeSites that have itMoving
HTTPS100%no earlier window yet
AI crawler access99%no earlier window yet
Crawlable99%no earlier window yet
robots.txt95%no earlier window yet
Internal links94%no earlier window yet
Mobile viewport94%no earlier window yet
Language declared92%no earlier window yet
Linked profiles91%no earlier window yet
Answer-first opening86%no earlier window yet
Sitemap86%no earlier window yet
Canonical URL81%no earlier window yet
Open Graph81%no earlier window yet
Page title72%no earlier window yet
Valid structured data72%no earlier window yet
Meta description71%no earlier window yet
Content depth71%no earlier window yet
Single main heading53%no earlier window yet
Business schema52%no earlier window yet
Opening hours43%no earlier window yet
Image alt text42%no earlier window yet
Where you are39%no earlier window yet
Heading order39%no earlier window yet
Name, address, phone37%no earlier window yet
llms.txt30%no earlier window yet
Recently updated27%no earlier window yet
Question headings25%no earlier window yet
FAQ schema4%no earlier window yet

A practice being common among measured sites is a fact about those sites. It is not a promise that adopting it gets a business recommended, and we publish our research on that question separately as it is measured.

Where does your site stand?

The same checks behind these figures run on any site, free, in about a minute.

Check my score