FAIndable
Measured, not estimated

The state of florist websites

We read and score real business websites the way AI assistants read them. This page covers 1,103 florist sites, re-read on a rolling cycle. Their average score is 63 out of 100. Every figure below is measured, and moves as the measurements do.

What florist websites have, and what they are missing

The share of measured sites with each practice in place. Movement compares the current reading window with the one before it, shown only where both windows hold a real sample.

PracticeSites that have itMoving
HTTPS100%no earlier window yet
AI crawler access100%no earlier window yet
Crawlable99%no earlier window yet
robots.txt96%no earlier window yet
Mobile viewport96%no earlier window yet
Linked profiles95%no earlier window yet
Sitemap94%no earlier window yet
Language declared93%no earlier window yet
Internal links92%no earlier window yet
Opening hours84%no earlier window yet
Meta description81%no earlier window yet
Canonical URL80%no earlier window yet
Valid structured data76%no earlier window yet
Content depth74%no earlier window yet
Open Graph69%no earlier window yet
Answer-first opening69%no earlier window yet
Where you are64%no earlier window yet
Name, address, phone63%no earlier window yet
Business schema63%no earlier window yet
Page title60%no earlier window yet
Image alt text54%no earlier window yet
Single main heading54%no earlier window yet
Heading order50%no earlier window yet
llms.txt26%no earlier window yet
Question headings24%no earlier window yet
Recently updated13%no earlier window yet
FAQ schema5%no earlier window yet

A practice being common among measured sites is a fact about those sites. It is not a promise that adopting it gets a business recommended, and we publish our research on that question separately as it is measured.

Where does your site stand?

The same checks behind these figures run on any site, free, in about a minute.

Check my score