FAIndable
Measured, not estimated

The state of legal websites

We read and score real business websites the way AI assistants read them. This page covers 3,712 legal sites, re-read on a rolling cycle. Their average score is 63 out of 100. Every figure below is measured, and moves as the measurements do.

What legal websites have, and what they are missing

The share of measured sites with each practice in place. Movement compares the current reading window with the one before it, shown only where both windows hold a real sample.

PracticeSites that have itMoving
AI crawler access100%no earlier window yet
HTTPS99%no earlier window yet
Crawlable99%no earlier window yet
robots.txt94%no earlier window yet
Mobile viewport93%no earlier window yet
Internal links92%no earlier window yet
Linked profiles92%no earlier window yet
Language declared91%no earlier window yet
Answer-first opening87%no earlier window yet
Sitemap86%no earlier window yet
Open Graph82%no earlier window yet
Content depth82%no earlier window yet
Canonical URL80%no earlier window yet
Meta description76%no earlier window yet
Valid structured data73%no earlier window yet
Page title68%no earlier window yet
Single main heading63%no earlier window yet
Where you are53%no earlier window yet
Image alt text52%no earlier window yet
Business schema51%no earlier window yet
Opening hours50%no earlier window yet
Name, address, phone48%no earlier window yet
Heading order41%no earlier window yet
llms.txt33%no earlier window yet
Recently updated32%no earlier window yet
Question headings32%no earlier window yet
FAQ schema6%no earlier window yet

A practice being common among measured sites is a fact about those sites. It is not a promise that adopting it gets a business recommended, and we publish our research on that question separately as it is measured.

Where does your site stand?

The same checks behind these figures run on any site, free, in about a minute.

Check my score