FAIndable
Measured, not estimated

The state of optician websites

We read and score real business websites the way AI assistants read them. This page covers 922 optician sites, re-read on a rolling cycle. Their average score is 61 out of 100. Every figure below is measured, and moves as the measurements do.

What optician websites have, and what they are missing

The share of measured sites with each practice in place. Movement compares the current reading window with the one before it, shown only where both windows hold a real sample.

PracticeSites that have itMoving
HTTPS100%no earlier window yet
AI crawler access99%no earlier window yet
Crawlable98%no earlier window yet
robots.txt95%no earlier window yet
Mobile viewport95%no earlier window yet
Internal links93%no earlier window yet
Language declared93%no earlier window yet
Linked profiles91%no earlier window yet
Sitemap89%no earlier window yet
Answer-first opening80%no earlier window yet
Open Graph79%no earlier window yet
Meta description76%no earlier window yet
Content depth75%no earlier window yet
Page title74%no earlier window yet
Canonical URL74%no earlier window yet
Valid structured data70%no earlier window yet
Opening hours70%no earlier window yet
Single main heading51%no earlier window yet
Image alt text49%no earlier window yet
Business schema47%no earlier window yet
Heading order46%no earlier window yet
Where you are42%no earlier window yet
Name, address, phone41%no earlier window yet
llms.txt32%no earlier window yet
Recently updated26%no earlier window yet
Question headings14%no earlier window yet
FAQ schema2%no earlier window yet

A practice being common among measured sites is a fact about those sites. It is not a promise that adopting it gets a business recommended, and we publish our research on that question separately as it is measured.

Where does your site stand?

The same checks behind these figures run on any site, free, in about a minute.

Check my score